All right, everyone, here it is, on schedule, the audio for Chapter 5 of The Chasm and the Collision, “Peetry,” read by the author, yours truly:
The usual disclaimers, restrictions, and permissions apply: Feel free to listen, to download, and to share as often as you wish, by whatever means you wish, but you are not authorized to make any money by doing so.
I’ll convert it to/create a video of the audio and post it on YouTube early next week, but in the meantime, please enjoy it here. To find earlier chapters, just search in the categories sidebar under “audio,” or you can go to my YouTube channel here.
Today, for the third installment of “My heroes have always been villains,” I discuss one of my favorite modern, “realistic” villains: Dr. Hannibal Lecter. Dr. Lecter has been portrayed by at least three exceptional actors of whom I’m aware, the most noteworthy being Anthony Hopkins, who performed the character brilliantly in the movie “The Silence of the Lambs,” and also creditably in “Hannibal” and “Red Dragon.” He was also played by the excellent Mads Mikkelsen in the TV series “Hannibal,” and (his first screen portrayal, to my knowledge) by the brilliant British actor Brian Cox (not to be confused with the rock star cum physicist, also brilliant in his own right).*
I am not, however, primarily interested in the portrayals of the good doctor on the large or small screen, though I have found them uniformly excellent. Here I take my cue from Thomas Harris himself, the character’s creator. He is reputed to have refused to see any of the movies based on his work, because he didn’t want his vision of his creation to be influenced by the interpretation of writers, directors, and actors who had visions of their own. I deeply respect this attitude, and I think it’s warranted. So, my discussions of Hannibal Lecter will focus, mainly or entirely, on his depiction in the books. This is not a sacrifice; Thomas Harris is one of the finest authors I’ve encountered, and I consider Hannibal, specifically, to be among the greatest books I’ve ever read, on a par with The Godfather and The Lord of the Rings. Continue reading →
For those of you in the United States, I hope you had an excellent Independence Day yesterday. Earlier in the week, I wrote a blog post on Iterations of Zero encouraging Americans to remember the meaning behind the holiday; you can read it here if you so desire.
My fiction writing (and my reading/promoting of already existing fiction) goes well. I’m almost done recording chapter 5 of The Chasm and the Collision. It’s slightly longer than the previous chapters, so editing it may take more time, but I still expect it to be available for your listening pleasure* by the end of next week, or perhaps by the middle of the following week. Reading for audio seems to take much less time than editing; this is in contrast to the process of writing a story, where the composition takes far longer than the editing process, even when that editing is thoroughly draconian. Continue reading →
It’s Thursday again, and time again for you to endure the ordeal of slogging through my blogging. I could say that it’s also time for me to slog through the process of writing another blog post, but I rarely think of writing as an ordeal (though sometimes the process of forcing myself to get started can be a minor challenge).
One crucial aspect of writing, of course—if you want to be a good writer, anyway—is that you need to read a lot. Most of the writers whose work I admire are or have been avid readers. This makes sense. One could probably say something analogous about musicians, or about other types of artists: it’s difficult to know what’s possible, to have a deep grasp of the intricacies of one’s subject, if one doesn’t expose oneself to what other artists have done. Of course, each person’s bandwidth is limited, as is each person’s interest and exposure, but that’s part of what makes art interesting, and fundamentally stochastic. Mozart, unfortunately, could never be influenced by the music of the band Yes, but the converse is true, through the accident of historical placement. I sometimes wonder what Mozart might have done with modern musical instruments and precedents at his disposal, just as I wonder what Shakespeare or Dickens might have written after extensive exposure to the modern world. We can, unfortunately, only imagine the wonders to be found in “Electric Guitar Concerto No. 4,” or “The Tragedy of Richard Nixon,” or “A Tale of Two Social Media.” Continue reading →
Welcome, welcome to another blog post Thursday. I didn’t write anything for Iterations of Zero this week, and for that I apologize; I’ve been feeling somewhat under the weather over the past several days (which, I guess, can literally be said of everyone who isn’t an astronaut living on the space station or currently on some other mission).
Work proceeds well on Unanimity, but as I’ve said before, it’s becoming a longer book than I ever expected it to become. It’s curious how that happens; I honestly didn’t expect it to be as long as The Chasm and the Collision, though I knew it would be longer than Son of Man. It is, however, going to be my longest book so far, unless I do some truly astonishing trimming in the editorial process…which is, I suppose, possible. I’m enjoying writing it, as far as that goes, though yesterday (being, as I was, home sick, not to be confused with “homesick”) I didn’t write anything at all. Continue reading →
Well, here it is, the audio for the third chapter of The Chasm and the Collision, read by me. It will be posted on YouTube sometime early next week, but for the moment, feel free to listen to it here. As always, feel free to download it, share it, etc., but you’re not authorized to make any money off of it…
…even if you could.
By the way, for ease of use, here are links to the entries on my blog where you can listen to earlier chapters: