Once again, I am writing this on my smartphone. Yesterday I didn’t even bother to take the laptop computer back to the house with me. I was pretty much fed up with everything. Though we had a successful day at work, there were multiple cases of people not paying attention to our guidelines and rules; but whenever I would bring them up, there was (and is) always an excuse to go around them‒sound familiar to anyone?‒and I repeatedly got overridden, leaving me to wonder why I bother.
I also hit the top of my head hard on the corner of my metal filing cabinet early yesterday, while reaching down to pick up a dropped pen. It really hurt, and it left a cut, and I had a headache and a sore neck for pretty much the rest of the day. Unfortunately, I don’t seem to have developed a subarachnoid hemorrhage, so I have to keep moving. It sucks.
And, of course, there’s all the idiocy that is actively occurring in America and the rest of the world. There might be some who would characterize certain things that happen and that people do as “sick” and/or even “insane”, but I don’t like to use such terms to describe the various moronic and submoronic things humans do that are not only detrimental but cause spreading suffering to others.
First of all, it denigrates people who are actually sick/have mental illness and other related disorders. Such people (of which I guess I am one) rarely do much harm to anyone but themselves‒though sometimes, some of us wish to do harm to certain carefully chosen other people.
But also, it dignifies the idiots. After all, insanity is a legal term that indicates someone does not know right from wrong or lacks the capacity to control their own actions. Now, at a deep level, it is almost certain that none of us has free will, at least not in anything but the vaguest, most hand-wavy, compatibilist sense. But there is a real difference between someone who has OCD and cannot help but wash his or her hands until they bleed and a person who selfishly and arrogantly assumes that they have the right and the power and the competence to try to run other people’s lives but who then don’t accept responsibility for the horrific messes they make.
Stupidity can be defined as doing something in such a way that it is worse than just random action‒like trying to get to the airport by driving around one’s residential block over and over again ad infinitum*, or to try to solve a Rubik’s Cube by just spinning one side over and over (again, ad infinitum). And this is so often the distillation of so many things that humans do, especially when they group together in significant numbers.
It reminds me of a post I saw on Threads or X or Bluesky or one of those. The person said that people are selfish when isolated, but that such selfishness doesn’t really work, that we only survive and thrive by drawing together and supporting each other, working together, caring for each other. This is true, as far as it goes‒humans are the most social of the social primates, and their greatest power comes from their ability to work together, to cooperate, to communicate. This is why written language is the wellspring and lifeblood of civilization. And yet, I am also reminded of the line from the original Men In Black, which I will only paraphrase here: a person can be smart, but people together are stupid, reactionary, panicky, dangerous animals.
Both of these things are true, at least within certain contexts. This probably explains at least part of the appeal of Ayn Rand’s** focus on rational self interest‒which, in a large society, is going to, in its limit, come to be the same thing as rational altruism. But it is strange to have those seemingly at least partly contradictory facts both be true, at least in a highly simplified outline of the social nature of naked house apes***.
It is terribly frustrating. Even the most well-intentioned people, like the person who made that point about humans being social and needing each other (or at least many of those who agree with those sentiments) will often virulently demonize those who are on the opposite side of a given political spectrum or argument, not even trying to show compassion or empathy or understanding for those who disagree with them.
Likewise, those on the “other side” who seem to wallow in self-righteousness and yearn for authoritarianism will nevertheless seemingly believe that, for instance, they follow the teachings of a very socialistic, compassion-loving rabbi from 1st century, Roman-controlled Judea.
These are some of the things that make me angry, not just the persistent headache and my other, never-ending body pains and mental divergences. And although anger can be energizing, it is also unpleasant and, as Radiohead said, “it wears me out”.
I can endure a lot, it seems, whether out of stubbornness or willpower or just my own form of stupidity, but there’s no clear reason to keep enduring when there’s no evidence of any available relief or any joy that lasts more than a few hours at a time before leaving me alone to stew in my own, solitary, odious juices again.
I really do hate the whole universe a lot of the time, and that time proportion appears to be growing as that time goes by, like the product of some perverse Dark Energy in my own psyche. I don’t know what to do about it in my almost entirely empty life.
I say almost entirely, because there are just enough little rays of light to keep me fooling myself that I might one day return to a satisfying, mutual daily existence with people I love, only to have those hopes draw away like a will-o-the-wisp, keeping me eager and even desperate to follow them, but leaving me lost and stranded in the marshland of my mind instead of just escaping into oblivion.
Oh, well. Life sucks. No shit, Sherlock, what else is new? Further clichés as thoughts warrant.
I hope you lot are in better mental states than I am, and that you each and all have a good day.

*To borrow an example, though I cannot right now recall from where.
**Do you think Ayn Rand might have been an undiagnosed autistic person? Discuss.
***It reminds me of the “Riddle of Steel” as described in the movie Conan the Barbarian. Early in the movie, Conan’s father tells him that you cannot rely on men or gods, but that you can trust steel. But then, later, Thulsa Doom (played by James Earl Jones) reveals the punchline of the riddle: Steel is not strong, flesh (i.e., a person) is stronger. These contradictory truths engender and represent the vortex of seeming paradox through which people must try to navigate, to find the eye of the storm, the balance point at which effective action is possible.





