Hello and good morning. It’s Thursday, the 26th of February in 2026, a date that’s only very slightly interesting whether you write it as 2-26-2026 or 26-2-2026. The fact that you have repeated 2s and repeated 26s is somewhat entertaining, but the zero throws potential symmetries off, making it not nearly as much fun as it could conceivably be. It’s a shame, really. I suppose you could write it as 26-02-2026 and rescue a bit of symmetry, but that feels like reaching. It’s not quite symmetrical anyway, unless one is writing in base-26 or higher. No, wait, even that wouldn’t work.
I don’t know about what I’m going to write this morning. That in itself, of course, is nothing unusual. But I don’t feel that I have much to say about anything at the moment. I don’t want to get into my depression and ASD and anxiety and chronic pain and insomnia and just general moribund state, because I’m sure no one wants to hear about it anymore, and in any case, there seems to be no way anyone can do anything about it that’s useful, which makes it all the more frustrating. Writing about it certainly hasn’t cured or even improved my state much, if at all.
Anyway, as I said the other day, you have been put on notice. Unless you just started reading my blog for the first time yesterday, you’ve no right to act fucking surprised no matter what happens.
Okay, that’s that out of the way.
Now, let’s see, what should I write today? I could discuss some topics in science, especially physics, though I also have literal, legally recognized expertise in biology, and I know a lot about quite a few other branches of science as well. This is because I have always been curious about how the world, the universe, actually and literally works on the largest and on the most fundamental scales.
I mean, yes, humans also have their rules and laws and social mores and antisocial morays and all that nonsense, but if you step back even a bit, you can see nearly all human behavior encapsulated by basic primatology. If you know how the various monkeys and gibbons and gorillas and chimpanzees behave‒especially their commonalities‒human behavior almost always fits right in. It’s usually not even very atypical.
That doesn’t make the specifics of behavior very easily predictable in any given case, necessarily; then again, we understand an awful lot about the weather and the climate, but the specifics of tomorrow’s weather are tough to predict precisely and accurately, let alone next week’s weather. Nevertheless, the physics of longer term climate effects of certain kinds of atmospheric gases is almost trivial.
Anyway, humans are too annoying to be very interesting, except in special circumstances. In this, they are perhaps a bit like cockroaches. From the point of view of a scientist who studies them, they can be interesting, and from just the right angle and with the right detachment, they can even be beautiful (or some of them can). But overall, they are merely large masses of highly redundant little skitterers, just doing their shit-eating and reproducing and infesting almost every possible location.
Which type of creature did I mean to describe just now? See if you can figure it out.
Of course, on closer scales, cognitive neuroscience and neurodevelopment and related stuff, such as “neural” networks, “deep” learning, and other such areas are fascinating. One thing interesting about them is how all the things that brains and computers and so on are and do are implicit in the laws of physics‒clearly they are some of the things that stuff in the universe can do‒and yet, for all we know, they have only ever happened here, just this once in all the vast and possibly infinite cosmos*.
And for all we can tell, given the human proclivity to plan about 20 Planck units ahead and then after that trust to luck, this could be the only place they occur, and their time will not continue much longer, certainly not on a cosmic scale.
I could be wrong about that…except in the sense that, since I am stating it merely as one of the possibilities, I am not actually wrong at all. Even if humans do survive into cosmic time scales and become cosmically significant, it will still not be easily debatable that it could have happened that humans would go extinct and would fail to go anywhere but Earth.
Of course, depending on the question of determinism, I suppose one could say that if humans (or their descendants) become cosmically significant then there literally was nothing else that could have happened, at least as seen from outside, at the “end”.
On the other hand, if Everettian quantum mechanics is the best description of the fundamental nature of reality, then in some sense, every quantum possibility actually happens “somewhere” in the universal quantum wave function, though those variations may not include all conceivably possible human outcomes.
Some things that seem as though they should be possible may simply never happen to occur (or occur to happen?) anywhere in the possible states of the universe. That feels as though it should be unlikely, given how many possible states can be locally evolved in the quantum wave function, but I don’t think we know enough to be sure.
Okay, well, I vaguely hope that this has been mildly interesting and perhaps thought provoking. It would be enjoyable to get more feedback and thoughts, but I don’t have a very large readership, and only a certain small percentage of people ever seem to interact with written material in any case, so I’m probably lucky to get the feedback that I get.
TTFN

*With the inescapable caveat that, if the universe is spatially and/or temporally infinite, and if as it seems there are only a finite number of differentiable quantum states in any given region of spacetime (the upper limit of which is defined by the surface area of an event horizon the size of the given region) then every local thing that happens, and all possible variations thereof, “happen” an infinite number of times. But given that all these regions are more or less absolutely physically distinct and incapable of “communicating” one with another, they can be considered isolated instances in a “multiverse” rather than parts of the same “local universe”.

Your footnote reminds me of “The Library of Babel” by Jorge Luis Borges. It’s about an infinite library that contains books with every possible permutation of the Latin alphabet. Most books are garbled nonsense but just by sheer chance, some must be exact copies of every book ever written. Not only that but there must also be infinitely many books that are exactly the same as, say, War and Peace, except for one character, except for two characters, etc.
Anyway, if we’re not happy with our current self, maybe we can find a slightly (or much) better variation of ourselves in another part of the library/universe, plus/minus a few different genes/characters. But of course, there must exist a worse version of ourselves too.
And I highly recommend Ficciones by Borges if you haven’t read him.
That’s a terrific story, and a really interesting philosophical exploration. “They” even made an online version of the library: https://libraryofbabel.info/
Awesome. Now we just have to find the “Man of the Book.” 🙂