In case it wasn’t obvious, I did not go to work yesterday. I have a head cold of some variety that seemed to begin in the afternoon on Wednesday‒maybe it started sooner than that, I’m not sure. Anyway, I stayed at the house yesterday, trying to rest. But I was pretty stuffed up, which I still am, and now my mouth is dry from (apparent) mouth-breathing when I slept.
Sorry, I know this is really dull material. Such is life, I guess. Or, at least, such is my life. I suppose a dull life is better than many of the lives that would make for more interesting reading. This was a point I first recall encountering in The Hobbit, when Bilbo remarked that his time in Rivendell would make boring reading, though it was wonderful to experience.
I think it is possible to have an exciting or at least interesting life that does not fall prey to the curse of “may you live in interesting times”. I think it is possible to have a life that most people would find fascinating to hear about, and which is also quite fulfilling to experience. But it does seem that this is a relatively small subset of available lives.
For the most part, humans seem to prefer stories about harrowing, horrific things. This is not restricted to fiction, but is also part of why news media tend to focus on the more dire and terrifying news stories.
Of course, there are probably good, sound biological reasons for this. As a matter of survival, it’s crucial to attend to danger and threat much more so than to pleasant, routine, comfortable things, because those creatures that don’t become extra alert and energetic when danger is present are less likely to leave offspring than are those that respond with arousal*. So the fact that many of our favorite stories describe horrible things may be analogous to why so many of our snacks are very sweet and/or very salty: a supranormal stimulus increases engagement powerfully, and can easily become habit-forming.
How in the world did I get on that subject? I’m not sure. I guess I could go back and reread this to find out, but I’ll be doing that when I edit it, anyway, so I’m not going to waste my time now.
In other news, I wrote a second verse for my “weekly” song on Wednesday afternoon, and even took a little notebook with me with the song paper in it, so I can continue the process wherever I might be. Unfortunately, I did not work on it at all yesterday, but then again, I didn’t really work on anything yesterday. I’ll try to write a chorus and then a third verse today.
I have to remind myself that I’m not trying to produce something superb, even assuming I could do that on command. I’m just trying to produce something**. So if it feels a little inane and contrived to me, well, that’s okay. It’s just got to be some “song”.
I use quotes there because I am really starting with the poem, the lyrics, which is “usually” how I do things. I don’t know if I’ll be able to do lyrics and music within one week on the same song. At least so far, that pace doesn’t seem to be in the process of being achieved, though I suppose I might finish the song and come up with a melody over the weekend. Or maybe what I can do is make songs in a kind of assembly-line style: lyrics this week, then next week, while coming up with lyrics for another song, do the melody for the first song.
I have heard that most songwriters tend to do melodies first and then come up with lyrics. That may be a true statistical statement, but I know it’s not the way everyone does it, because at least two of my favorites do otherwise.
We know, of course, that Elton John writes the music after Bernie Taupin writes the lyrics, by their own description of their songwriting process. And, of course, many operas and musicals start with the libretto***, and the music is written afterward. And Roger Waters, one of the best lyricists ever****, implies in The Wall that he writes his lyrics as poems, e.g., “I’ve got a little black book with my poems in…”, and also e.g., the scene in the movie where young Pink has his poem book, which contains the lyrics for the song Money, discovered by the oppressive teacher.
So, writing lyrics and then making a melody afterward wouldn’t put me in bad company (though I don’t know how the band Bad Company actually wrote their songs).
Anyway, that’s enough for today. Batman knows if I was even coherent. I suppose the editing will make that somewhat clearer, but my mind might be fuzzy enough that I cannot even tell in the immediate editing period. But you will know. So, please, have patience with me.
And have a good day and a good weekend, also, if you’re able.
*There’s nothing sexy in this use of the word, just to be clear. I’m not referring to creatures that get “turned on” by danger and threat; those types of creatures seem less likely to survive than their compatriots, ceteris paribus.
**Not the Beatles song. I already did a cover of that, anyway.
***Italian for “little book”, in case that wasn’t obvious.
****As evidence: He wrote almost all of the lyrics for Dark Side of the Moon, Wish You Were Here, Animals, and The Wall.
*****I feel like this could be a good album title.
