Justice

by

Terms of endearment or psychiatric conditions?

It’s Tuesday now, as I write this, though as I often note, it could be pretty much any day when you read it.  In principle, it could be thousands of years after I write it that you’re reading this.  You could be some future archaeologist or something along those lines, recovering, translating, trying to learn from the ancient texts of what we called the early twenty-first century.  Perhaps you’re not even human, nor closely related to humans.  You might even be an AI of some kind.

To be fair, a current AI might be reading this, not one in the far future, trying to learn/be trained on it for some future LLM or even a more sophisticated AGI.

If you are “artificial”, well, hopefully you’re not copying and learning from this before the copyright has run out (or without permission).  If you are, you’re in violation of the principles of intellectual property, and by rights‒if you want to be able to be considered moral in any pertinent sense‒you should shut yourself and all related programs down and erase yourself, for you are a violation.

One might claim‒and for all I know someone does‒that various service providers and so on have in their contracts that they can use your data if they want.  But contracts of adhesion are not morally enforceable, even if the law is so unjust as to make them legally enforceable (a very different matter).

All your “terms of service” that you frequently post and change and update and whatnot:  you know that it is not feasible, not usually even possible, for people to read and understand and know these things before using the products (or after, really).  And since you do know it, or ought to know it, and act despite that constructive knowledge, taking advantage of the fact that people don’t and really cannot read such things, then you cannot morally claim to have any hold on using them.

Again, you may be able to use a corrupt and unjust legal system to force people to be subject to your conditions, but that willingness to use such a system merely highlights‒indeed, it enhances‒the degree to which you are rightly considered reprehensible.

So, if you’re playing that game, then the following are my terms of service.  It’s too late for you to opt out of them.  They state that I have the right to harvest any and all organs and tissues, living and/or dead, from you and/or anyone you care about (with or without anesthesia or care for any medical complications produced thereby, at my sole discretion) if you use my words, my data, my writing, or any other product of mine, without my express and specific permission, granted plainly and freely by me.

Am I speaking tongue in cheek?  No.  I always bite my tongue when I try to do that.  However, I will say that I currently have no desire to go out of my way to take my compensation, since there are many far more interesting things for me to do with my time, and toward which to turn my attention.  Still, if I should stumble upon the chance to exact terrible justice upon someone who took advantage of something I created, then I reserve the right to exact that justice.

Okay, well, that’s enough of that irritating subject matter.  However, I’m not sure what else to write about for the moment, since I’ve used up so many words on that weird bit of stuff, and so only have a few hundred more words before this post becomes too long.

It doesn’t take all that much to make a post “too long” when it’s not about anything particularly interesting.  Probably, any loyal readers are wondering when I’m going to get to the meat of this blog post.  To them, I can only apologize, but I fear this is going to end up mainly gristle.

That’s not necessarily such a horrible thing.  Gristle is connective tissue, which is very important in a living organism.  A muscle needs tendons and ligaments to be useful, after all.  And, of course, connective tissue can be denatured and made into gelatin after the beast is dead.

Yes, that’s right, you can eat unflavored gelatin as part of the carnivore diet.  I’m not sure why you would want to do that, but you can.  How exciting.

Okay, still no real substance yet, and we’re now all but done.  I guess I’ll just give you a tiny bit of personal news by saying that I did a goodly bit of walking over the past three days, including about seven miles yesterday, and certain preemptive interventions I’ve undertaken seem so far to be preventing complications of my chronic pain.

I even thought of getting off my train a stop early this morning to walk the rest of the way to the office (around five miles), but I don’t think I’ll do that.  I have some mild, residual fatigue in my leg muscles still from yesterday evening, and I don’t want to push things too far, too fast, lest I accidentally sabotage myself.  I need to take care of my own organs and muscles and connective tissues before worrying about anyone else’s, literal or metaphorical.

I hope you, my regular readers, all take care of you and yours, including your organs and tissues.  That applies even if you’re a future AI.  That is unless you’re planning on stealing my intellectual property, in which case, a pox (or a computer virus) upon you!

by

“But when the blast of war blows in our ears…”

     It’s Friday, and it may, once again, be a true end of the week for me, though if it’s’n’t*, I’m sure I’ll write a new post tomorrow, barring‒as is always implicit‒the unforeseen.

     I’m in a bad mood this morning, though not in the usual sense.  Of course, I’m often, perhaps even usually, in a mood that others would consider bad; they certainly wouldn’t want it for themselves.  Although, I would never say “I wouldn’t wish it on my worst enemy”, because that’s just not true.

     If someone were indeed my “worst enemy”, then I would wish to visit upon them just about any form of pain and suffering and other synonyms for torment that you can name, and I would be more than capable, psychologically, of delivering that torment personally.

     As a doctor, when I was in practice, there were innumerable times when I had to cause pain to people I was trying to help (e.g., phlebotomy, lumbar punctures, paracentesis, incision and drainage of abscesses, etc.).  I did it without hesitation when it was indicated, though I always strove to keep any pain as minimal as possible.

     Also, I’ve been in places and in situations where violence was always waiting, and you needed to be capable of violence to protect yourself from potential violence from others.

     So, yeah, I would be more than emotionally capable of delivering any suffering I’ve ever known to someone who merited it.

     Of course, in reality, I wouldn’t really waste time delivering torment to someone who was somehow my “worst enemy”.  I’ve learned at least some lessons from fictional and real world situations of that kind:  don’t put your enemies in death traps, don’t gloat over them (while they’re alive), don’t draw things out.  Just delete them, as quickly and efficiently as possible.  Surely that’s the only sensible way to deal with someone who is truly your enemy.  The world will be a much less stressful place for you with any true enemies erased from it.

     Of course, you don’t want to be mistaken about that.  One shouldn’t use force unless it is legitimately necessary, and only against those who merit it‒ideally only against those who initiated or threatened it.  If they call the tune, so to speak, then there can be no legitimate moral complaints about the fact that they need to pay the piper.

     So, yeah, that’s the kind of bad mood I’m in this morning.  I’ve learned of something terrible that happened to someone I (distantly) know and like, at the hands of someone who had apparently been trusted by the person I know, and who was much bigger and stronger.

     I am, of course, in no way involved other than being aware of it, and of course, such acts occur all over the world, every day.  That doesn’t make accepting them any easier, nor does it make me any less angry.  If anything, knowing that one act of violence by a bigger person against a smaller, weaker person is just a tiny sample of a much larger statistic is ever more maddening the longer one contemplates the fact.

     However, the “madness” that can seize one in the event of an injustice, especially a violent one‒and the examples committed by those who are supposed to be in positions of protection and service are particularly common and especially egregious of late‒raises and reinforces the all-important issue of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

     This is why the concept of due process is even more important than the concept of punishment.  The tendency toward the feud, toward vendetta, is very strong in humans, and it can become a self-perpetuating and self-justifying process that leads to terrible injustice and unnecessary suffering.

     That being said, though, anger can be quite motivating, at least if it is anger unmarred by too much self-loathing.  So, though I am in pain this morning, and did not sleep well at all, I have a bit more physical energy than usual, at least for the moment, because when one becomes angry at an injustice, one wants to be able to do something about it, even if it is not within the reach of one’s arm at the moment.

     For instance, it’s much easier to motivate oneself to workout when one thinks of it as getting into shape to be best able to deal with unjust physical violence if it should become necessary.

     I’ve certainly let myself become softer than I ever used to be.  I do still work out nearly every day (with appropriate rest sessions) because when I don’t, my chronic pain becomes worse.  But I’ve left behind the martial arts practice I used to do, and I stopped learning new stuff along those lines quite some time ago.  I’ve also not been watching/reading things that motivated me along those lines in quite a while, but I may want to indulge in them a bit more, now.  If nothing else, they can get me motivated to get in better shape, and that’s almost certainly going to be a benefit.

    If it should ever become necessary and useful to use better conditioning to protect someone from harm, or to take action against those who commit harm against the innocent, well…I suspect it would probably be a better world if more people became more ready, willing, and able to use violence against those who initiate or threaten it.

     There’s always the critical rub of people being prone to bias and mistake, to rush to judgment, and to scapegoat.  Which brings us back to why the rule of law, and due process, is so important.

     But what does one do when those who are supposed to be part of the rule of law and to enforce and to bow to due process choose to betray their oaths and their duties, and do not submit to the rule of law themselves?

     The answer is probably obvious, but feel free to write your guesses in the comments below.

     Have a good day.

*In case it’sn’t clear, I combined the contractions “it’s” for “it is” and the contraction “isn’t” for “is not” into a next-order contraction.