Well, it’s Friday now, and it’s actually the first of the month, which would normally have been yesterday, but this is a leap year (and so, in the US, a presidential election year).
I really do think the days of the months as we have them now are stupidly erratic and irrational. I think it would be more fun if we had 12 thirty-day-long months and then just, at the end of the year, a five-day-long festival, when most people are off work and we celebrate the passing of the winter solstice*, and the coming lengthening of daylight. Then, on leap years, there could be an extra day to the festival, and that would be a joyful thing.
Oh, well. I don’t think that’s likely to happen. But it’s a nice thought, I guess.
I did manage to write a page of Extra Body yesterday, and it was a computer-written** page, so it was maybe four hundred to five hundred words. It is a slight shame, but writing on the laptop computer is just much more natural for me (ironically), and it doesn’t exacerbate the soreness at the base of my thumbs like writing by hand.
Of course, writing this on my smartphone makes the base of my thumbs get a bit sore, too. I should probably just do both things on the laptop computer if I’m going to keep doing them. I communicate best by writing on the laptop computer, anyway, probably much better than I do by spoken word. I don’t know. Maybe not.
Anyway, I guess it’s a good thing that I wrote a bit of fiction yesterday. And I mean to write a page today, and tomorrow as well, since I work tomorrow. The story is going okay so far, and since it’s not a horror story, it shouldn’t get too dark, which is a relative rarity for my fiction. Once I finish it, I guess I can see if I’m ready to write HELIOS.
I guess, given the state of my thumbs, I’ll write that whole thing on the laptop computer. It is a shame to have to let the two new spiral-bound notebooks go to waste, but I don’t see any other reasonably available alternative. I suppose it would be nice if I used them to practice calculus and linear algebra and physics problems and so on, and if I do such problems, I guess I will use it. But it seems unlikely that I’ll find the gumption to do those things.
I have my science and math books out and around my desk: Classical Electrodynamics, and Calculus, and Gravitation, and Euclidean Quantum Gravity, and Quantum Field Theory, As Simply As Possible, and Spacetime and Geometry.
I would love to get through all of them, but my mental energy is sapped and drained by having to deal with all the nonsense of the human world. Unfortunately, I have to make a living‒no one is offering to support me and provide my basic needs while I study up on my physics and mathematics. Why would they? People have a hard enough time having me around even when I’m paying my own way.
I’m so tired of the world. It’s really just a bastion of idiocy and irrationality and dirt and unnecessary suffering. And it’s not as though I’m some exception to that description. I certainly don’t see myself as superior to the nonsense around me. Maybe if I did, I would feel better, but it probably wouldn’t be good for the other people in my life, in the world. I could all too easily see myself becoming a hyper ambitious villain of some variety.
Of course, the real reason I don’t see myself doing such a thing is that it would be irrational and illogical. While there are surely people who are exceptionally gifted and creative and productive, it’s absurd to think that any one person is the greatest of all, or is destined to rule, or is “special” in some fundamental sense.
No matter how smart you are, there is always going to be someone out there who is smarter than you at least at some things. If there were no such one alive right now‒and there almost certainly is such a one‒then there will be in the future or has been in the past. Going beyond even that, in the space of all possible minds there are potential thinkers compared to which Einstein would be as an amoeba is to Einstein‒and more so.
Also, in the real world, all people who have ever achieved great “power” have only had it through and by the acquiescence or cooperation or loyalty or whatever of other people. And any power “over others” that requires the consent or the cooperation of others is not any power at all. It’s just a transient configuration in a complex and chaotic system.
There is a line in one of the “chapters” of the Tao te Ching that reads something along the lines of “mastering others is strength; mastering oneself is true power”. It sounds very Stoic in nature, though I seriously doubt that Lao Tzu ever met a Stoic. Still, the similarity is not a mere coincidence. One of the hallmarks of true knowledge and understanding is that it will tend to be converged upon by disparate people as long as they are all legitimately and honestly seeking to understand the universe.
I would quibble with the first half of the quote, maybe; I’m not sure that mastering others really is even any kind of strength. It can probably be useful, but it’s not going to give one much beyond transient benefits. And it’s certainly questionable whether one ever does or can master others.
This is corollary to something I often tell a coworker who troubles himself all the time about “why” people in the office (or on the phone) say and do the things they do. I point out to him that even the people themselves who say and do things rarely (if ever) know why they do and say what they do and say. There’s no point in him trying to figure it out from his third person standpoint.
Just observe what people do and respond to it and adjust to it as best you can‒but don’t dwell on how it reflects on you or what you might have done to deserve it, or whatever. Just try to let inconsequential things like insults or jokes at your expense wash over you, like the chattering of squirrels or the crowing of a rooster. Try only to pay attention to useful things.
And, of course, the Tao to Ching is not wrong to encourage mastering oneself, as much as possible. That’s more than enough challenge for a single lifetime, frankly, and I am far from convinced that anyone has ever truly succeeded.
I certainly know that I haven’t.
*Yes, this is northern hemisphere biased, but the majority of humans live in the northern hemisphere. Five days off in the beginning of summer wouldn’t be so horrible for those in the south, anyway. They could go to the beach, for one thing.
**Meaning I wrote it using a computer, not that a computer wrote it. Then again, my mind is a form of computer, a universal Turing machine (or nearly so), but if I were approaching the matter that way, then any writing I do, even with pen on paper, is computer-written.

You sound very “zen” today, Robert. What’s going on? No, seriously! Nice post. I like your idea of the long festival at the winter solstice. You even used the word “joy” without “lack of” before it. Nice! I’ve been wanting to ask you about one of those books you say are lying about your desk. The one about quantum theory? It has “simply” in the title. Is it at all simple? I’d like to at least understand what the word “quantum” means. It seems to usually appear next to “physics” and I have no mind for physics. Should I even bother? Anyway, keep taking whatever kind of pill you took this morning. It makes you sound like a well-adjusted fellow. Ha ha ha. You know I’m just messing with you. Have a nice weekend even if you DO have to work.
I haven’t gotten very far yet into the “As Simply As Possible” book, but it’s written by the author of one of the premier textbooks in the field. I have some familiarity with the subject, and so far it’s reasonably simple, but we’ll see.
The word quantum refers to the fact that, at a very fundamental level, going back to Planck, it turns out that energy doesn’t come in continuously varying amounts but only in finite, divisible “packets” if you will–a quantum of energy, for instance, which solved the “ultraviolet catastrophe” of thermodynamics when Planck just kind of pulled it out of his hat to fix the math of the radiation spectrum of a hot “body”. Then Einstein demonstrated, using the photoelectric effect and its peculiarities, that LIGHT had to be quantized, that it came in what we now call “photons”. This was just one of his four or five paper in 1905, which included work on the proof that atoms and molecules must exist using Brownian motions, and of course, Special Relativity. It was the photoelectric effect paper that one him the Nobel Prize, NOT relativity–that was too radical and far out.
I appreciate this response. I’m bowled over, actually. I am suddenly (recently– in the past few weeks maybe), acutely aware of the cumulative effect of these past nearly 3 years of banishment to the slums (due to economic conditions and trends outside of my control) combined with what was previously an unimaginable number of significant losses (to death). I’ve been flailing about in what, from today’s vantage point, looks sad, pathetic, desperate, unawares… I think I’ve been in shock. This morning feels exactly like I remember feeling when, as a much younger person, I would wake from a nightmare that could only be shaken off physically. I remember the relief I felt once I realized I’d been sleeping and that what I’d experienced wasn’t “real”. But this is real. Oh my god.
I wish I could offer more support than just my own meanderings.
What “bowled me over” were the succinct few lines that answered my question (what does quantum even mean) and the obvious depth of knowledge required to write them. The clarity of thought, the casual recall of terms and concepts and the ability to get it down in such a condensed space. It’s admirable. And I almost let that distract me, yet again, from the very real issues in my life that need addressing. The point is you charitably responded to my question about quantum which left the opening for me to spill the truth of the shit I’m wading through. Those “meanderings” are supporting me more than you know.